Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

Study: Women should date 'Joes'

Vanessa Johnson

Issue date: 4/23/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Women at Sacramento State should seek less eye-catching men, researchers of the University of Tennessee concluded.

Published in February in the Journal of Family and Psychology, the study shows that women and men both experience better relationships when the woman is more attractive than the man.

James McNulty of the University of Tennessee led the study, along with other researchers, according to LiveScience.com. McNulty claims that men tend to place more value on how a woman looks, while women tend to look at the economic standing of a potential life-long mate. Women also seek a man who is seen as a good father for their future children.

McNulty could not be reached for comment.

The research included 10 minutes of taping 82 newlywed couples who had been together for about three years before they got married. During the research, there were special "coders" who rated the wives in order to assess whether the male was less attractive or not.

According to LiveScience.com, the research states that one-third of the couples who attended had a more attractive wife, one-third had a more attractive husband and one-third had equal looks. The couples with the more attractive wives seemed to be interacting the best way with one another through positive responses when a problem occurred within the relationship.

There may be a universal understanding to how a man may choose his wife, said Patty Woodward, human sexuality professor at Sac State.

"Men tend to choose a woman who is better looking than them, and has the ability to carry their children," Woodward said. "They have an innate sense to find a woman with child-bearing hips or the physical stature to carry a child."

Men may not think that they look for attributes such as "child-bearing hips," but studies have shown that they do, she said. Similarly, women may not think they look for a "father-like" figure.

"With women, interestingly enough, there is a biological component to find a man who is a good provider or husband," she said.

Society often bases attractiveness on culture and media, she said.

"Somebody as beautiful as Angelina Jolie is still air-brushed in pictures and that makes it seem like to be a beautiful woman, you have to be more than perfect."

America is one of the most looked-to nations that many other nations mimic, so everybody's perception of "beautiful" is based on what the media tells them it is, she said. This can also be true when it comes to relationships and who a person may choose, Woodward said.

Lisa Harrison, associate professor of psychology at Sac State, said she thinks that those who are seeking a significant other tend to look for somebody who has looks that are either close to or at the same level of attractiveness as them.

Senior business major Marcelle Gonzales said she thinks that the findings of this research are not surprising.

"If you have ever seen a commercial with a family and seen the husband and wife, you can see that the wife is always way more attractive than the husband. It seems like society gives off this impression that ugly men can get any woman they want," Gonzales said. "This gives the idea that women have to settle for just any guy. We need to upgrade."

Agreeing with Gonzales, Woodward said the way a husband or wife is chosen is based on how society and the media think a person should pick a prospective soul mate.

Woodward said that there is no solution to finding a perfect husband or wife.

"We choose based on chemistry and heart. You are not better off with somebody who is less or more attractive than you," she said. "There is no formula; it is all individual."

Other students felt differently on the assessment of physical attributes and its relevance in relationships.

"I think being happy is subjective," said senior child development major Brittney Stenson. "This research doesn't really tell me anything, because I think that it is human nature to want to look at something that is attractive or appealing to yourself, so why would a pretty girl want to be with an ugly guy? It doesn't make sense."

Sophomore undeclared major Nicci Evens said she feels physical attractiveness has never been what she solely seeks in a relationship.

"I look for somebody who is funny and has a great personality. Looks are important, but if a guy has a great personality and makes me laugh, then most girls, including myself, will find him way more attractive," she said. "That is what attracted me to my boyfriend."

Through the research, McNulty demonstrated that men who are with women who are more attractive than themselves tend to give more effort toward a relationship.

"The husband who's less physically attractive than his wife is getting something more than maybe he can expect to get," McNulty told LiveScience.com. "He's getting something better than he's providing at that level, so he's going to work hard to maintain that relationship."

The results of this research, according to LiveScience.com, suggest that looks are not an important factor for women. However, they do play a role in how a relationship may turn out: Men tend to find an attractive woman, while women tend to find a man who is not as physically attractive as they are.

Vanessa Johnson can be reached at vjohnson@statehornet.com.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Poll

What do you want most for Christmas?
Submit Vote

View Results

Online Features Section

Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Local reggae artists sound off
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Mayday Parade interview
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Lovedrug interview
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists

Advertisement